Thursday, March 19, 2009

Award for Sivathanu Pillai

I met this person at IIT-M, after his talk on "Brahmos - The making & India in defence". Very down to earth person and a good sense of humour, Dr.Pillai is a genius. His talk was mind-blowing and inspiring. His worry and sadness about bright students leaving for the US and leaving behind India could clearly be seen in his speech. A true patriot ended his speech with a beautiful story, which I will never forget.
"Money", "Fame and "Love" visited a couples home to stay overnight and have some dinner. But the condition was they could invite only one person. After much contemplation, the couple decided to invite "Love". When they entered with "Love", both "Money" and "Fame" also came. The couple were surprised and asked what the issue was. All three of them said in unison, "Where there is love, there is also money and fame".
So, "Love your country, and fame and money will come automatically".
Dr.Pillai, another genius among the 100s of others who have made this country proud.


Award for Sivathanu Pillai Special Correspondent

CHENNAI: The International Project Management Association (IPMA), Switzerland, has awarded its highest level (Level A) certification of Project Directorship to A. Sivathanu Pillai for his contribution in the field.

Dr. Pillai is the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of BrahMos Aerospace Private Limited, New Delhi.

He is the first Indian to receive this certificate.

The IPMA is an organisation comprising 44 national project management associations from all over the world. The certificate was awarded to him on Tuesday in New Delhi by Adesh Jain, deputy chairman of the IPMA.

A press release says Dr. Pillai has 40 years of experience in project/programme management in the Indian Space Research Organisation, and the Defence Research and Development Organisation. It adds that under his leadership, the scientific communities of India and Russia designed and developed the BrahMos missile in a short span of time and made it a world leader in the cruise missile family.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Daughters of India: Art and Identity

A tribute to women

Author-photographer Stephen P. Huyler talks about the journey of “Daughters of India: Art and Identity”



Capturing the pulse A still from the book

Author-photographer Stephen P. Huyler says he never clicks a picture without permission. Yet his “Daughters of India: Art and Identity” published by Mapin narrows into hidden rural crevices and urban scenes to capture women, known and unk nown, at their candid best. The book, a journey through 262 colour photographs, travels through villages and cities, and narrates the stories of 20 women from different backgrounds. Indra peeps out of her veil for a few seconds, while Achamma overcomes her reticence and joins the others to be the chief players in the book.

While Huyler knits together disparate tales and battles, he allows creative expression to be the thread that binds the women. So the tales of Savitri from Dhunlo, Orissa, Padma from Madurai in Tamil Nadu and Sonabai of Puhputra in Chhatisgrah come alive along with vibrant pictures.

Huyler’s intention was to let the world know “the pulse of the Indian woman” and quell misconceptions. He writes in his introduction: “Much of Western reportage about Indian women is misinformed and misguided, depicting all or most of them as victims.”

Despite the problems Indian women face, Huyler says: “They display phenomenal inner strength and resilience. My respect for them has grown as the deeper levels I see of their difficulties.” In the West, Indian women are identified with the injustices they face, says the author-photographer who was in New Delhi recently for the book launch. His introduction touches upon dowry harassment, female infanticide and treatment of widows.

Strength of women

Quiz him on the battles women have to wage despite geographical locations, and Huyler responds: “The cultural characteristic of India is kind of unique. In the Western cultures, women are subjugated in the belief that they are weaker. In India, it is the fear in men, of the strength of women. Yet women make these little cracks on the pavement to let the flower bloom.” Huyler, also the author of “Meeting God: Elements of Hindu Devotion,” draws on the references to Shakti in Indian mythology.

Huyler took about eight years to ready the book. However, his link with India goes back 37 years. “Initially, it was just wanderlust and my deep fascination with people and art,” Huyler recalls. “My mentor, Beatrice Wood, told me that in India I might find a group of cultures in a relatively small land mass that would feed my interest and would be worthwhile to document,” says Huyler. A Bachelor of Arts in Indian Studies from the University of Denver followed, and he plunged headlong to India, where Kamaladevi Chattopadhyaya and Rukmini Devi Arundale nurtured him.

“Strong Indian women have guided me,” he says. Though he admits it is impossible to be objective and forget the cultural baggage he carries, Huyler says: “For 37 years, I have worked and travelled in India possibly more than any American or Westerner has.” When he steps into the homes of rural communities, he brings with him the “rare ability to just be”. “It doesn’t make me less American, but gives me a breath of experience from where I can draw,” says Huyler.

According to him, it is his ability to “absorb” and be a mere “witness” that helps his subjects shed inhibitions even when he is interviewing and clicking pictures in the remotest corners of India. “I let them emerge,” he says. “I only go where doors are open,” he adds.

The challenges

“Daughters of India” threw challenges to Huyler, but he never compromised on his principles. “It was difficult to reach to Achamma Joseph in Kochi who is heralded as the poster girl of IT. She was very cautious and afraid of industrial espionage. But once she was assured of my trustworthiness, that door opened.”

The book also gave Huyler many poignant moments. “Pushpa from the slums of Mumbai, Larku the child bride, Kusima who deals with abject prejudice, Bimla, the Dalit woman from Varanasi…,” Huyler reels off.

P. ANIMA

150th Anniversary of J C Bose

Celebrating an Indian’s breakthrough science Ashok Parthasarathi
Sir Jagadis Chandra Bose finally gets his due around his 150th birth anniversary.


Sir Jagadis Chandra Bose made seminal scientific discoveries and technological inventions in electromagnetism and plant physiology.

Despite being free people for more than 60 years now, Indians are yet to develop the tradition of remembering and honouring their great savants of pre-Independence times. One example of such neglect relates to Jagadis Chandra Bose (1858-1937), arguably the first ‘modern’ scientist to have emerged from India. This year marks the 150th birth anniversary of J.C. Bose, who made seminal scientific discoveries and technological inventions at the world level, in two s eemingly unconnected areas of science and technology — electromagnetism and plant physiology. This was unique for a modern scientist.

In 1895, Bose successfully demonstrated in public in colonial Calcutta the wireless transmission of electromagnetic waves. Generating waves using a self-designed and built transmitter at one end of a link and sending them to a similarly built detector located 75 feet away, through intervening obstacles such as the body of Lieutenant General Mackenzie who commanded the British troops in the Calcutta garrison, he set off an explosion in a cache of gunpowder at the other end.

That Bose built all the equipment in the abysmal conditions that existed at the University of Calcutta then, and the country as a whole, in the 1890s makes the achievement even more mind-boggling and creditworthy. Over the next decade, Bose obtained four U.S. and U.K. patents for his invention with the aid of friends.

It took some five years more for a technician of mixed Italian-Irish parentage, Guglielmo Marconi, to make a similar public demonstration. In the heyday of imperialism, the Nobel Prize for physics was awarded to 35-year-old Marconi and a 59-year old German physicist from Strasbourg, Karl Ferdinand Braun, “in recognition of their contributions to the development of wireless telegraphy.”

Bose was not given the prize although he had published his results in leading international journals and lectured at the Royal Institution in London in 1897 at the invitation of his teacher, Lord Rayleigh, one of the most distinguished British scientists of the time. In 1899 Bose read a paper at the Royal Society in London, ‘On a Self-Recovering Coherer and the Study of the Cohering Action of Different Metals,’ on his invention of the coherer which used conductors separated by mercury. In the paper, which was published in April 1899, he wrote: “For very delicate adjustments of pressure, I used in some of the following experiments an U-tube filled with mercury, with a plunger in one of the limbs; various substances were adjusted to touch barely the mercury in the other limb. ... I then interposed a telephone in the circuit; each time a flash of radiation fell on the receiver the telephone sounded.” Performing a series of experiments, Bose concluded that“there can be no doubt that the action was entirely due to electric radiation.”

More than two years later, Marconi transmitted radio waves across the Atlantic, using Bose’s coherer — with nary a mention of Bose. Academic honours such as a D.Sc. by research from London University, a knighthood in 1917 and a membership of the Royal Society of London in 1920 that were conferred on Bose did little to affirm his pioneering status as the father of wireless. Ironically, in a book by Orrin Dunlap, which Marconi personally edited, a page and a half is devoted to Bose, who is acknowledged by Marconi to have provided crucial support at a critical juncture when he needed it most.

Partial amends were made in 1998 when the Institution of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), New York, a global professional academy in the field, announced: “Our investigative research into the origin and first major use of solid state diode detector devices led to the discovery that the first transatlantic wireless signal in Marconi’s world-famous experiment was received by Marconi using the iron-mercury-iron-coherer with a telephone detector invented by Sir J.C. Bose in 1898.”

With these revelations, belated though they are, we may safely say that Bose, and not Marconi, was the discoverer and demonstrator of wireless radio propagation through free space and thus the father of radio, television and all other forms of radio communication including the Internet. The IEEE inducted Bose into its Wireless Hall of Fame.

Against this background, the Centre for the Philosophy and Foundations of Science, New Delhi, led by its Director Ranjit Nair, teamed up with Christ’s College Cambridge (of which Dr. Nair is an alumnus) to organise at the college a symposium titled “Beyond Frontiers: From Physics to Plant Sciences,” on December 6, 2008 to mark Bose’s 150th birth anniversary. At the symposium, Cambridge scientists expressed their appreciation of Bose’s pioneering contributions. The physicist E.C.G. Sudarshan spoke on Bose’s work in electromagnetism, while distinguished plant geneticist M.S. Swaminathan (also a Cambridge alumnus), spoke on green genes to combat global warming.

A bust of Bose made by a Kolkata sculptor was unveiled by India’s High Commissioner in London, Shiv Shankar Mukherjee. Two Kolkata physicists, Bikash Sinha and Sibaji Raha, respectively Directors of the Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics and the Bose Institute (founded by Bose in 1917), spoke.The Master of Christ’s College, Frank Kelly, welcomed the gathering and Dr. Ranjit Nair proposed a vote of thanks. Leading scientists from the U.K. such as David King, former Chief Scientific Adviser to the British Government; Martin Rees, President of the Royal Society and Master of Trinity College Cambridge; and Partha Dasgupta, Professor of Economics at Cambridge, were present. (So was this writer.)

In a curious twist to the tale, Marconi’s grandson, the space physicist Francesco Paresce Marconi, while on a visit to Kolkata in 2006, expressed his astonishment on finding at the Bose Institute the coherer that his grandfather had used to receive the trans-Atlantic wireless signal. “The instrument was critical to radio communication,” he said. On another visit to Kolkata some weeks ago, the grandson is reported to have said that while Bose was a Professor of Physics of international repute, his grandfather was a technician, who nonetheless deserved credit for turning Bose’s discovery and the equipment he invented into an industrial innovation. He admitted it was unfair that Bose was overlooked by the Nobel Committee.

By crossing the boundaries of physics into plant physiology, Bose seemed to some of his dogmatic contemporaries a dangerous heretic. But the more perceptive among them saw him to be a visionary. One must not forget that the distinction between living and lifeless matter was by and large taken for granted among his scientific and lay contemporaries. It required courage and belief in oneself to demonstrate similarities in the electrical responses of living matter and lifeless matter. His theory of the ascent of sap as being due to electromechanical processes involving pumping within living plant cells took six decades to be verified experimentally.

The symposium, and the unveiling of a bust of Jagadis Chandra Bose in his Cambridge alma mater, mark a milestone in the way Indian scientific capabilities are perceived worldwide. It is perhaps the only case so far when an iconic British institution like Cambridge University saw it fit to commemorate an outstanding Indian scientist of colonial times 150 years after his birth in British India. Can we say that at long last, the prowess and international image of our country are changing among scientific circles? We have every reason for cautious optimism.

(Ashok Parthasarathi is a former scientific adviser to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and was Secretary to various scientific departments of the Government of India. He acknowledges the contribution made to this article by Dr. Ranjit Nair, Director, Centre for the Philosophy and Foundations of Sciences, New Delhi.)

Women Inventors

Forgotten wonders

Move over Women’s Day. With their great inventions, women have for centuries gone beyond symbolic observances, says ZEHRA NAQVI



Inspired Ideas (from left) Marie Curie is the most famous woman inventor, but there are others such as Mary Anderson, Harriet Strong, Patricia Billings and Hedy Lamarr

Have you ever wondered who invented the windshield wiper? Or a medical syringe? What about the car heater?

So many of the little things that make our lives easier are used by us without giving a minute’s thought to the person who first made them. It would be quite an interesting exercise to find out about these unsung heroes. And in this case, unsung heroines — Mary Anderson for the windshield wiper; Letita Geer for the syringe; and Margaret Wilcox for the car heater.

Surprised? Most people would draw a blank when asked to name a woman inventor.

At best, they might come up with Marie Curie (and even she is best known for discovering radium, not for the radium-isolation techniques she designed). Very few people are aware that female minds have been behind some ingenious inventions. Ranging from ordinary but useful creations such as mounted globes, patented by Ellen Fitz in 1875, the cooking stove created by Elizabeth Hawk in 1867, or the electric water heater by Ida Forbes in 1917, to inventions of imposing stature such as dams and reservoir construction by Harriet Strong in 1887, submarine lamps and telescopes by Sara Mather in 1885 or elevated railways by Mary Walton in 1881, women have been hard at work.

Amusing

Run a Google search for inventions by women, and you’ll find umpteen interesting answers. Some can be quite amusing, such as chocolate chip cookies, alphabet blocks or disposable diapers! Others could be complicated, and need careful reading. Sample this: famous Austrian actress Hedy Lamarr was also a pioneer in the field of wireless communications. The “spread spectrum technology” she invented was, simply put, a way to create an unbreakable code that prevented interception of messages by Nazi agents in World War II. This technology formed the technical backbone for cellular technology and other wireless communication.

Another thrilling example of female ingenuity is the ‘Blissymbol Printer’ invented by Rachel Zimmerman of Ontario in the mid 1980s. The printer works through symbols on a touch pad, which are converted into written language and enable communication by non-speaking people, even those with severe disabilities such as cerebral palsy.

Some of these inventions sound like objects from science fiction works. What would you say about construction material that is indestructible, fire-resistant as well as non-toxic? This seemingly magic material was created by Patricia Billings, a sculptor who was trying to create a cement additive to prevent her sculptures from shattering. What she ended up inventing is the world’s first workable replacement for asbestos, patented by her as ‘Geobond’.

The first woman inventor recorded in history is Sybilla Masters, who developed a way to process corn into food and fibres as early as 1715. But that patent was issued in her husband’s name by the British courts. This, in fact, brings us to the chief reason why history has recorded so few inventions by women — the non-existence of legal rights.

Until the late 1800s women could not claim ownership of property, and patents, being a kind of intellectual property, could never be issued to a woman. So most offerings of female minds went in the names of husbands, sons or fathers. Added to this were low women education and socio-cultural beliefs that refused to accept that a woman might be able to innovate and invent.

In the words of Swiss woman author Laurence Deonna: “People complain that society, because of its ruthlessness, kills thousands of little Mozarts every year, but never has a word for all the little Marie Curies drowned in the kitchen sink…” How true!


http://www.hindu.com/mp/2009/03/17/stories/2009031750240500.htm